Current Events

April 2017 Pension Finance Update

April 30, 2017

Pension plans broke even in April and remain in positive territory through the first four months of 2017. Last month, rising stock markets neutralized the impact of higher pension liabilities (driven by lower interest rates) for both model plans we track. Through April, Plan A is up almost 3% and Plan B is up almost 1% so far this year. Read More

Money market and stable value fund litigation

April 25, 2017

In addition to (and, sometimes, as part of) plaintiffs’ 401(k) plan fee lawsuits, some plaintiffs have sued sponsors challenging the prudence (under ERISA) of the use of money market funds as capital preservation vehicles. Plaintiffs have also filed suits against providers and (in at least one case, a plan sponsor) challenging stable value fund investment strategy. In this article we briefly review the status of this litigation and discuss two recent “wins” for plan sponsors, in Bell v. Anthem and Barchock v. CVS. Read More

Viability of stock drop claims based on public information

April 24, 2017

On March 30, 2017, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri granted defendants’ motion to dismiss in Lynn v. Peabody Energy. Peabody is a “stock drop” case – a case in which defined contribution plan participants investing in a company stock fund sue after the company stock loses significant value. In this article we discuss the Peabody court’s decision, generally holding, under Fifth Third, that “impending bankruptcy” does not constitute “special circumstances” allowing such a suit. Read More

Current outlook – April 2017

April 09, 2017

In this Current Outlook we review DOL’s 60-day delay of the applicability of its Fiduciary Rule, Congressional Review Act legislation voiding the Obama DOL’s “path forward” for state-mandated private sector retirement programs and the recent decision for plaintiffs in Bell v. Anthem. Read More

Roth-only?

April 02, 2017

It is being reported that House Republicans are considering, as part of their tax reform effort, converting the current 401(k) system to “Roth-only,” primarily as a way to raise revenues to finance reductions in marginal tax rates and reform of the corporate tax. In this article we review: (1) the difference between the tax incentives provided by non-Roth and Roth 401(k) contributions; (2) the reasons why House Republicans are considering this change (why converting to Roth-only, or simply increasing the portion of 401(k) contributions that get Roth treatment, increases revenues); and (3) possible effects on retirement savings resulting from such a change. Read More

31-35 of 278<  ...  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  ...  >
Share this with your Colleagues:

Latest News:

  • November 2017 Pension Finance Update - Read More
  • Current outlook – November 2017 - Read More
  • Latest SOA analysis shows year-over-year increase in mortality - Read More
  • October 2017 Pension Finance Update - Read More
  • Current pension outlook – October 2017 - Read More
  • Cash Balance Plan Design - Read More
  • ReDefined Benefit Plan™ - Read More