ReDB – a better solution for nondiscrimination problems

November 06, 2013

In September, we published an article on the nondiscrimination problem presented by some frozen plans. Generally, the problem arises because, as part of a plan freeze or similar transaction, employers create a ‘closed group’ of ‘old’ employees who get a different, ‘better’ benefit than the benefit provided to new employees.

As we discuss in our article, a closed group like this may create a problem under the Tax Code nondiscrimination rules because, over time, the number of highly compensated employees (HCEs) in it will increase, relative to the number of non-highly compensated employees (NHCEs): some NHCEs will, after a pay raise or a promotion, become HCEs; others will terminate (there is generally more turnover among NHCEs than HCEs).

There are a lot of different versions of this problem. In this article we want to focus on a particular, fairly common, closed group ‘fact situation,’ where a DB plan is closed to new entrants. Current participants continue to earn DB benefits, but new hires are only covered by a DC plan. Under this structure, at some point, employers are likely to have a nondiscrimination problem, and, as many are finding out, the problem may crop up several years earlier than anticipated.

The simplest answer is a ‘freeze, DC’ strategy. And it is fairly common. But in these circumstances, a ‘ReDB’ strategy can avoid the nondiscrimination issue, allowing ‘closed’ participants to continue to earning their traditional DB benefits, as explained below.

While a closed group will generally pass the Tax Code nondiscrimination test at the time of the initial freeze, it often becomes discriminatory – ‘HCE-heavy’ – relatively quickly thereafter. Disqualification can be avoided, however, if the old (DB) plan and the new (DC) plan can be tested together, generally on what's called a ‘benefits basis’ – i.e. comparing the annuity benefit at normal retirement age for both DB and DC participants.

But there’s a catch: there are special rules that don't allow this sort of ‘testing on a benefits basis’ unless you meet certain minimum requirements. You can meet these minimum requirements in different ways, but most of the alternatives are expensive (e.g., providing a benefit of 7.5% of pay to DC participants).

One of the easier and inexpensive ways to meet this requirement, however, simply requires that at least half of the company’s NHCEs receive at least half of their retirement benefit from a DB plan. For companies that go the ‘freeze, DC’ route, this strategy ceases to be effective once half of the company’s NHCEs are no longer covered by a DB plan.

Instead, employers can avoid this inevitable failure by putting new employees into a ReDB plan. A ReDB plan is a DB plan – so it automatically satisfies that 50% rule. But, from the sponsor's point of view and risk tolerance, it functions like a DC plan. That is, participants have an account to which contributions and trust earnings are credited, just like a DC plan. We explain how this works in our article The ReDefined Benefit Plan.

October Three, LLC is a full service actuarial, consulting and technology firm that is a leading force behind the reemergence of defined benefit plans across the country. A primary focus of the consultants at October Three is the design and administration of comprehensive retirement benefits to employees that minimize the financial risks and volatility concerns employers face.

Through effective plan design strategies October Three believes successful financial outcomes are achievable for employers and employees alike. A critical element of those strategies is the ReDB® plan design. The ReDefined Benefit Plan® represents an entirely new, design-based approach to retirement and to the management of both the employer’s and the employee’s financial risk, focusing on maximizing financial efficiency and employee value.

For more information:

233 South Wacker Drive, Suite 8350
Chicago, IL 60606-7147
Phone: 312-878-2440
Fax: 866-945-9676
Contact Us

Share this with your Colleagues:

Latest News:

  • Budget deal retirement savings provisions - Read More
  • January 2018 Pension Finance Update - Read More
  • DB funding and 2017 tax planning - Read More
  • PBGC finalizes regulation revising missing participant program - Read More
  • Current outlook – 2017 year in review - Read More
  • Cash Balance Plan Design - Read More
  • ReDefined Benefit Plan™ - Read More